🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.